(Recent Self-Emancipator posts discussed self-emancipators among the Civil War’s very earliest: Tidewater Virginia freedom strivers, often then and now called contrabands. Some readers are expecting a post about a planned PBS film on those enterprising slavery escapees and their Virginia descendants. That post is coming.)
Historian and political commentator Heather Cox Richardson, with an enormous Substack following, wrote recently that former president Barack Obama had said that Americans had lost the sense of “a common national story.” In 2023, I had something to say about that in the Washington Post after Post reporters offered the same surmise then that the former president has offered now.
- - -
Last week on December 5 in Chicago, the former president made his lost-national-story statement in the third in his annual series of lectures for his foundation’s Democracy Forum. Professor Richardson calls those lectures “a historical and philosophical exploration of the weaknesses of twenty-first century democracy as well as a road map of directions, some new and some old, for democracy’s defense.”
Last year on July 30, a headline atop the Sunday Washington Post front page declared “Nation’s racial past drives fight for future.” The three-author article lamented that “the nation’s metastasizing culture wars . . . have broadened to strip Americans of a shared sense of history.”
It’s the same surmise. So I’ll exclaim again what I exclaimed in the August 9, 2023 Self-Emancipator post “All sides in the history wars”: “Strip Americans of a shared sense of history? I believe it, but I also know a sense of history that all sides in the history wars could share.” That post continued: “That’s why I advocated a national emancipation memorial last year in a History News Network essay. It’s why I’ve started this Substack.”
Then I quoted my letter to the editor that the Post printed on August 4 under the headline “The U.S. does have a shared national story”:
We do have a shared national story, at least potentially. It's the long arc of the moral universe that bent toward emancipation. It would appeal to any side in the history wars.
Wall Street Journal columnist Jason Riley — a Black man, it’s necessary to point out — wrote in Hillsdale College’s ultraconservative Imprimis, “What makes America unique is not slavery. It’s emancipation.”
In 2020, David W. Blight, who directs Yale University’s Gilder Lehrman Center for the Study of Slavery, Resistance, and Abolition, published a New York Times op-ed headlined “There’s a Chance to Tell a New American Story. Biden Should Seize It.” In a 2020 Post op-ed, Blight urged an “epic process” of memorializing emancipation.
This national story of our second founding comes directly from slavery’s crimes against humanity and the Declaration of Independence. It shows Ukrainian, Chinese and other freedom strivers that Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo was right in his Nobel Prize lecture that “no force . . . can put an end to the human quest for freedom.”
It centrally involves what Princeton’s Sean Wilentz describes as “hundreds of thousands” of Civil War slavery escapees “forcing the issue of freedom, which helped change a war to crush southern secession into a war to destroy slavery.”
Ira Berlin of the University of Maryland’s Freedmen and Southern Society Project explained in a 1992 Post op-ed “how the slaves freed themselves.” James M. McPherson, with others, calls that the “self-emancipation thesis.”
It's hiding in plain sight as a shared national story affirming founding principles, but the country has not yet adopted it. I think the country will.
When I wrote that final paragraph 16 months ago, I had not yet begun saying what I say regularly now, borrowing phrasing from Thomas Jefferson:
Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that Americans will eventually esteem the Civil War’s multitudes of freedom-striving, emancipation-forcing slavery escapees. Just not yet.
By the way: The Post itself unintentionally illustrated that just-not-yetness. With the online copy of my letter, the paper included a picture of the Emancipation Memorial in Washington’s Lincoln Park—a statue depicting a shirtless Black American kneeling before Abraham Lincoln, who’s holding a copy of the Emancipation Proclamation and looking downward. It presumes Black inferiority and omits any sense of those “hundreds of thousands” of enterprising Civil War slavery escapees “forcing the issue of freedom.”
It was well intended when dedicated in 1876. In 2024, it’s a reminder of the just-not-yetness.
Richardson, it should be pointed out, is a self-appointed point person for defending the ruling elite's status quo. She is less historian than Democratic Party apologist - always read to find some past event to explain why a Democratic president ordering domestic surveillance is a Good Thing, but then worrying that the Republican president-elect may do the exact same thing only this time It Will Be Different.
This is a perspective President Obama shares. It is not that the nation has lost lost its "shared story" that worries him - it's that the American people had the temerity to choose not-Democrats to run the country the next two years.
When Richardson speaks of "democracy," if we believe all else that she writes, what she really is speaking of is not representative governance at all. The model of "democracy" that Richardson, Obama, the Washington Post, New York Times, etc., dream of is a system where an entrenched ruling class is given an imprimatur of legitimacy by token elections in which the influence and participation of the working classes is kept to the bare minimum needed to protect that thin veneer of legitimacy. This utopian view of an enlightened elite class ruling over the savages is what's leading to a certain wistful take on the long-overdue ouster of the Assad dictatorship in Syria by working-class Islamist militias this week. We're seeing headlines in the legacy media along the lines of, "Sure Assad did some bad things, but what has his overthrow unleashed?" The similarities between the media's coverage of the Assad overthrow and the Trump election are frankly a bit creepy.
Our truly shared national story is the one you describe - original sin giving way to an ever more perfect union, the first nation founded on an ideal rather than shared DNA, a national story of continual redemption and renewal.
The abandonment of the Democratic Party by Hispanic and African-American voters is particularly galling to establishment types like Richardson who still see emancipation as a gift from the good whites, and not as an act of self-liberation.